Ever considered the difference between commitment and involvement?
This advertisement of the Standard Bank Group got me thinking about commitment and involvement, especially within sport, and especially so in the post Covid-19 world we find ourselves in.
(“We’re all in - YouTube,” n.d.)
A student once asked his professor: "I don't understand the difference between involvement and commitment. Aren't they the same thing?"
"No, they are not the same thing,” said the professor. He went on, "think of it this way: have you ever had eggs and bacon for breakfast?"
"Yes" responded the young student.
"Ah, then you will understand." the professor said slowly. "In your breakfast of eggs and bacon, the chicken was involved, but the pig was committed." (Wilson, 2017)
Involvement: the act or process of taking part in something
(“INVOLVEMENT | meaning in the Cambridge English Dictionary,” n.d.)
Commitment: a promise or firm decision to do something:
something that you must do or deal with that takes your time
(“COMMITMENT | meaning in the Cambridge English Dictionary,” n.d.)
From the Pig and Chicken analogy and from the definitions that the Cambridge dictionary gives us, it is evident that there is a big difference between the two.
Involvement only mentions “taking part” in something, whereas Commitment features the strong words “promise” and “firm decision” and something that “takes your time”.
The question: When are you just involved versus when are you committed to the sport (task) that you do?
This after all can be the defining difference in success for high performance athletes and coaches.
Dave Trott put it best in his blog:
“If we’re merely ‘involved’ in something then we don’t have to give it our all.
If it fails, it’s not the end of the world.
But if we’re ‘committed’ that’s a different matter.
Then it really is do or die.
We’ve got a lot more at stake.” (Trott, 2010)
Social media plays a massive role within high-performance sport in modern society.
To be cool and to look good is very important, especially for our younger athletes. Commitment can be very uncool for a start. Athletes are not supposed to look like they are working hard and trying hard right? Social perception counts and what if they gave it their all and still failed? There are then no excuses.
If they are just involved and not fully committed the excuse is still there that they did not really try and have more in the tank to give next time. (Trott, 2010)
The challenge is to understand the signs of involvement versus commitment in our athletes and to understand what it is that will make them switch from just being involved to fully committed to the cause.
The answer lies in the outcomes that athletes achieve and experience.
“Outcomes are the rewards and costs a person experience in an activity” (Schmidt & Stein, 2016)
The greater the rewards relative to the costs, the higher the outcomes.
In high performance sport these rewards can be anything from financial rewards, trophies, and emotional satisfaction in the achievement of a desired goal.
Rewards and cost does not exist in isolation however. (Schmidt & Stein, 2016)
As high-performance coaches and athletes we need to be aware what it is that drives commitment within our athletes and ourselves.
Back in 1993 Scanlan and Simons published the Sport Commitment Model. This is a simple model that highlights five factors that drives commitment in sport.
Four of these factors has a positive outcome on commitment, while one has a negative impact.
Büssing (20020 also highlighted trust as a factor that plays a massive role in the commitment shown.
Let’s start with the negative factor.
Involvement alternatives
Where there are alternatives that athletes can participate in and get better rewards with the same cost or even less, athletes will not be committed and just be involved until the opportunity arises to jump ship.
How do we then keep athletes committed to the cause to achieve maximal results?
Positive factors are the following:
Sport Enjoyment
Make sure that there is maximal enjoyment in what you do and in what you present as a coach. In a recent article on NBC Sports (https://www.nbcsports.com/bayarea/warriors/how-steve-kerr-preserved-warriors-winning-culture-through-losing-seasons) Steve Kerr points out that enjoyment was one of the key factors instilled with the Golden State Warriors. (“How Steve Kerr preserved Warriors winning culture through losing seasons | RSN,” n.d.)
Personal Investments
Where athletes have made personal sacrifices, the commitment will be stronger. It is the same as the age-old principal that you will look better after something that you have bought for yourself with your hard-earned money than after a gift. With personal investment the cost factor is high but so are the emotional reward achieved in the end that comes with these sacrifices.
Social Expectations and Norms
As mentioned earlier, social media has become a major role player in the way high performance sports is portrayed and marketed. The higher the social expectation and or norms are the more committed athletes will be to their cause and sport. This however can create pressure on athletes that on the other hand be negative in performance even though the athlete is fully committed. This is tight rope to be walked very carefully.
Involvement Opportunities
The more athletes are involved, the happier they will be and the more they will commit. Within professional team setups this can be harder than what you would think. With big squads and only a percentage of that squad being able to play, keeping all involved becomes a challenge.
Trust
In a world where change is all around us, confidence in leadership is at an all-time low and
uncertainties are the order of the day; trust goes a very long way in the commitment
process.
In summary, sport commitment is a motivational force that reflects a person’s desire and resolve to continue participation in sport.
Sport commitment is a dynamic, psychological state that can vary over time, through seasons, and over the course of careers.
Individuals’ level of commitment influences behavior in the form of choice, persistence, and effort (Williams, 2013)
In a high-performance environment, the factors that plays a role in the level of commitment needs to be identified and actively pursued to make sure that commitment is at a maximum and involvement at a minimum.
Let’s makes sure in our environment everyone is ‘in’ and no one is ‘out’.
Commitment after all is a necessary condition for success.
As a result of this article I caught up with Oliver Randall from Tribe 365 for a chat.
You can see a condensed version of our conversation below.
We split the chat into:
What does it mean to be committed vs involved? 0:07
What made you look at Committed vs Involved? 0:33
What are the challenges to getting committed individuals? 4:08
How does the pathway to committed look? 8:17
How much do we sacrifice focus on results for getting culture right? 13:58
Bibliography